Connect with us

Crime

In a Stunning Vote, The House Passes Bill To Block Jeff Sessions’ Expansion Of Asset Forfeiture

Published

on

In a surprise move, the House of Representatives on Tuesday approved an amendment to the Make America Secure and Prosperous Appropriations Act that will roll back Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ expansion of asset forfeiture.

As reported by Intercept, “amendment number 126 was sponsored by a bipartisan group of nine members, led by Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI). He was joined by Democratic Reps. Ro Khanna of California; Washington state’s Pramila Jayapal, a rising progressive star; and Hawaii’s Tulsi Gabbard.”

Civil asset forfeiture is a practice by which law enforcement can take assets from a person who is suspected of a crime, even without a charge or conviction.

Jeff Sessions called for the elimination of the Obama-era rule that limits such practice and pushed to allow state and local police agencies to take assets and then give them to the federal government — which would, in turn, give a chunk back to the local police. This served as a way for these local agencies to skirt past state laws designed to limit asset forfeiture.

Republican Justin Amash, the prime proponent of the amendment, spoke forcefully in favor of the Obama-era rules on the House floor and the need to bring them back.

“Unfortunately these restrictions were revoked in June of this year. My amendment would restore them by prohibiting the use of funds to do adoptive forfeitures that were banned under the 2015 rules,” he explained, according to the report.

Virginia Democratic Rep. Don Beyer reached across the aisle to voice support for Amash’s effort.

“Civil asset forfeiture without limits presents one of the strongest threats to our civil, property, and Constitutional rights,” he said on the floor. “It creates a perverse incentive to seek profits over justice.”

Republican Reps. Mark Sanford of South Carolina, Raul Labrador of Idaho and Dana Rohrabacher of California joined in the effort, along with Democrat Earl Blumenauer of Oregon.

The amendment passed with a voice vote, meaning it had overwhelming support.

Click to comment

Crime

Federal Judge Put The Brakes On Bill Barr’s Efforts To Drop The Case Against Mike Flynn

Published

on

On Tuesday, U.S. district judge Emmet Sullivan, who is presiding over the Michael Flynn Case, put the brakes on Attorney General William Barr’s directive to dismiss the case against the former National Security Adviser and ally of President Donald Trump.

Sullivan issued an order that declined to immediately close Flynn’s case, despite the fact that the Department of Justice has moved to dismiss all charges.

In his ruling, the federal judge wrote that “given the current posture of the case,” some outside parties may want to file their own friend-of-the-court briefs on the matter, and that he would like to solicit such briefs.

Share your thoughts.

Continue Reading

Trending